Candidate Ratings and Endorsements

We respectfully invite all candidates seeking a judicial or quasi-judicial position to seek out a rating and endorsement from the Women Lawyers Association of Michigan (WLAM).  WLAM is proud to endorse and rate candidates running for election or seeking appointment to such offices.

WLAM  makes all ratings and endorsements without regard to sex, party affiliation, religion, national origin or age. The decision is based on  professional qualifications and a demonstrated interest in advancing the cause of women in general, and women in the legal profession.

All ratings and endorsements are made solely on the basis of WLAM evaluation criteria and may include review of the candidate’s application, an interview of the candidate, a background check, input from references,  input from WLAM members of the region where the office is located, and any other first hand knowledge that committee members may have about the candidate.   All deliberations of the Candidate Rating and Endorsement Committee are confidential.

Each candidate, for either elected or appointed office, will be given one of the following ratings: Outstanding, Highly Recommended, Recommended, Not Recommended, or No Rating. Note that these ratings categories involve new criteria, recommended by the CREC and adopted by the WLAM Board in June 2022. The ratings are defined as follows:

Outstanding.  To be rated “outstanding,” a candidate shall meet the criteria of “highly recommended” and “recommended” and must have the following:

  • Candidate exhibits exceptional qualities for judicial service, including exceptional legal ability, outstanding personal and professional integrity, and an interest in, and demonstrated commitment to, working to improve the administration of justice;
  • Candidate possesses the highest capacity for distinguished judicial temperament, including courtesy, impartiality, and respect for all persons, the law, the judicial process, and for the dignity of the court;
  • Candidate has actively participated in charitable activities, community activities, mentoring, civic organizations, and professional bar organizations; and
  • Candidate has consistently exhibited commitment to promoting access to justice for all and has a demonstrated record of advancing women in the legal profession.

In addition, having at least 10 years’ substantial experience appropriate for, and relevant to, the judicial position being sought is preferred.

Highly Recommended.  To be rated “highly recommended,” the candidate shall meet the criteria of “ recommended” and must have the following:

  • Candidate exhibits superior qualities for judicial service, including excellence in legal ability, wide experience, wisdom, intellect, insight, and impartiality;
  • Candidate has demonstrated a commitment to and has a reputation for integrity, good character, courtesy, and respect for all parties;
  • Candidate has actively participated in charitable activities, mentoring, professional bar organizations, and community activities; and
  • Candidate is acknowledged in the legal community as affirmatively espousing the position of all women in society and has a demonstrated record of advancing women in the legal profession.

In addition, having at least 5 years’ substantial experience appropriate for, and relevant to, the judicial position being sought is preferred.

Recommended.  To be rated “recommended,” the candidate must possess the following:

  • Candidate exhibits the essential qualities and fitness for judicial service, including good legal ability, experience, wisdom, intellect, insight, and impartiality;
  • Candidate has a reputation for integrity, good character, courtesy, and respect for all persons; and
  • Candidate should be seen in the legal community as affirmatively espousing the position of all women in society and a demonstrated record of advancing women in the legal profession.

Not Recommended.  A candidate shall be rated “not recommended” if:

  • Candidate does not exhibit the essential qualities and fitness for judicial service because candidate lacks one or more of the following attributes: good legal ability, experience, wisdom, intellect, insight, or impartiality;
  • Candidate is not a member in good standing of the State Bar of Michigan or not a member in good standing of any other state’s bar association to which he or she has been admitted;
  • Candidate is not viewed in the legal community as affirmatively espousing the goals of access to justice for all or the advancement of women in the legal profession; or
  • Candidate has failed to meet the criteria for a “recommended” rating.

No Rating.  A candidate shall be given no rating:

  • If there is insufficient information available to the Committee regarding the candidate’s fitness for judicial office at the time the candidate is being considered for rating; or
  • If the candidate withdraws his or her request for a rating before the rating process is completed.

All candidate ratings and endorsements will be announced to the public.

If you would like to seek a rating and endorsement from WLAM, please click here to download the application.   The completed application may be submitted via email or mail to info@womenlawyers.org, or 120 N. Washington Square, Suite 110A, Lansing, MI 48933.

*For those seeking an appointment to a judicial position as opposed to an elective judicial position: at this time, WLAM is only endorsing and/or rating candidates who have been granted an interview by the State Bar of Michigan Judicial Qualifications Committee and/or the Governor’s office.


2024 Endorsements

  • Andrea Banfield, 44th Circuit Court – Outstanding
  • Jennifer Engelhardt, Court of Appeals – Outstanding
  • Daniel Korobkin, Court of Appeals – Outstanding
  • Susan Longworth, 44th Circuit Court – Highly Recommended
  • Kerene Moore, Court of Appeals 3rd District – Outstanding
  • Adrienne Young, Court of Appeals – Outstanding

Past Ratings and Endorsements

Click below to see ratings and endorsements issued by WLAM in the past:

Facebook
LinkedIn
Instagram
Twitter
YouTube
RSS